Translation

New York Times story shoots down popular myth that sprinkler requirements negatively impact housing development

By Fred Durso, Jr. If there’s one myth fire sprinkler advocates hear ad nauseum, it’s the one about fire sprinkler ordinances driving up housing costs and forcing homeowners to seek cheaper alternatives in neighboring communities or states. A recent article in The New York Times notes this notion couldn’t be further from the truth. California has been requiring sprinklers in new homes since 2011, and has not seen a negative impact on housing stock or affordability. In fact, as the story states, “there’s a robust demand for housing.” Take into consideration these figures highlighted in the story: the Sacramento region has approved more than…

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

2017 Alabama Fire Summit Turns Attention to Fire Prevention

By nfpa@jiveon.com After a record year of 115 fire fatalities in 2016, educators and fire service members joined together in…

Media, fire service turn out to underscore new study on economic impact of fire in unsprinklered homes

By nfpa@jiveon.com During an event held this week, the public was alerted to a new Canadian study underscoring the economic…

Wreath’s single red light bulb reminds residents about fire hazards

By Lisa Braxton Fire officials in Wausau, Wisconsin, have begun their annual “Keep the Wreath Green” campaign to raise fire…