Translation

New York Times story shoots down popular myth that sprinkler requirements negatively impact housing development

By Fred Durso, Jr. If there’s one myth fire sprinkler advocates hear ad nauseum, it’s the one about fire sprinkler ordinances driving up housing costs and forcing homeowners to seek cheaper alternatives in neighboring communities or states. A recent article in The New York Times notes this notion couldn’t be further from the truth. California has been requiring sprinklers in new homes since 2011, and has not seen a negative impact on housing stock or affordability. In fact, as the story states, “there’s a robust demand for housing.” Take into consideration these figures highlighted in the story: the Sacramento region has approved more than…

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

Applications now being accepted for NFPA Remembering When Conference

By nfpa@jiveon.com This week, the application period opened for NFPA’s Remembering When™ Conference scholarship awards. The conference is scheduled for…

Losing his fiancee in historic fire, burn survivor describes painful aftermath

By Fred Durso, Jr. In his previous post, NFPA blogger Rob Feeney discussed the nightmares and realities he experienced following…

NFPA appoints Charles Stravin vice president of business operations

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) today announced the appointment of Charles (Chuck) Stravin as vice president of business operations,…