Translation

Commentary: Opponents’ argument that new homes are safer holds no weight

By Fred Durso, Jr. In my last post, I posed the question, “When do new homes become old homes?” In this post, I continue analyzing the sprinkler opponent’s argument that fire sprinklers need not be required in new homes because new homes are safer from fire than old homes. People who make this claim point to improved electrical wiring and circuits; updated furnaces and appliances; improved vertical and horizontal fire separations; larger windows, especially provided in basements with bedrooms; and the installation of smoke alarms. It is true that these improvements do help reduce some causes of home fires and some avenues of fire…

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

Quiz/Sweepstakes helps college students test their cooking fire safety knowledge during Campus Fire Safety Month

By nfpa@jiveon.com September is Campus Fire Safety Month and this year NFPA and The Center for Campus Fire Safety (The…

Using fire sprinklers, eye-catching display pays tribute to home fire victims

By nfpa@jiveon.com Created by members of the South Carolina Fire Sprinkler Coalition, this display uses fire sprinklers to underscore U.S.…

New safety tip sheet available on hoarding and its dangers

By Lisa Braxton Hoarding is a condition in which a person has persistent difficulty discarding personal possessions. The large amount…