Translation

Commentary: Opponents’ argument that new homes are safer holds no weight

By Fred Durso, Jr. In my last post, I posed the question, “When do new homes become old homes?” In this post, I continue analyzing the sprinkler opponent’s argument that fire sprinklers need not be required in new homes because new homes are safer from fire than old homes. People who make this claim point to improved electrical wiring and circuits; updated furnaces and appliances; improved vertical and horizontal fire separations; larger windows, especially provided in basements with bedrooms; and the installation of smoke alarms. It is true that these improvements do help reduce some causes of home fires and some avenues of fire…

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

NFPA takes the fuss out of fundraising for your Fire Prevention Week campaign

By nfpa@jiveon.com Engaging your community in this year’s Fire Prevention Week campaign will ensure that more homes are protected from…

Play it cooking safe during the Superbowl

By LisaMarie Sinatra This Sunday will be a day filled with lots of cheering, groans and a plenty of excitement…

Unified support by Maryland firefighters prevents attempt at weakening sprinkler requirement

By Fred Durso, Jr. Volunteer firefighters in Caroline County, Maryland, are being credited for stopping efforts to water down a…