Translation

Commentary: Opponents’ argument that new homes are safer holds no weight

By Fred Durso, Jr. In my last post, I posed the question, “When do new homes become old homes?” In this post, I continue analyzing the sprinkler opponent’s argument that fire sprinklers need not be required in new homes because new homes are safer from fire than old homes. People who make this claim point to improved electrical wiring and circuits; updated furnaces and appliances; improved vertical and horizontal fire separations; larger windows, especially provided in basements with bedrooms; and the installation of smoke alarms. It is true that these improvements do help reduce some causes of home fires and some avenues of fire…

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

Summer season: peak time for grilling fires

As Memorial Day weekend approaches, backyard chefs everywhere are dusting off their grills, eager to spring into the long-awaited barbeque…

House fire claims 11 year old, injures firefighter in a state trying to reverse home fire horrors

By Fred Durso, Jr. “I was shocked, stunned you know, especially hearing screams that I’ve never heard in my life.…

Fire Prevention Week kicks off today: Hear the Beep where you Sleep!

By Lauren Backstrom Today is a big day. Fire Prevention Week kicks off, and will continue all the way through…