Translation

Commentary: Opponents’ argument that new homes are safer holds no weight

By Fred Durso, Jr. In my last post, I posed the question, “When do new homes become old homes?” In this post, I continue analyzing the sprinkler opponent’s argument that fire sprinklers need not be required in new homes because new homes are safer from fire than old homes. People who make this claim point to improved electrical wiring and circuits; updated furnaces and appliances; improved vertical and horizontal fire separations; larger windows, especially provided in basements with bedrooms; and the installation of smoke alarms. It is true that these improvements do help reduce some causes of home fires and some avenues of fire…

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

3 tips to reduce risk when working on outdoor electrical projects

By nfpa@jiveon.com During this last week of our national Electrical Safety Month campaign, NFPA and ESFI are reminding people about…

Safety advocate initiates a victorious push for sprinklers in Illinois

By Fred Durso, Jr. Tom Lia is one busy man. He’s a constant presence at the number of live burn/sprinkler…

Charlotte Fire Department announces winners of Fire Prevention Week bulletin board contest

By nfpa@jiveon.com Hidden Valley Elementary School won first place in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fire Prevention Week bulletin board contest. Third grade…