Translation

Commentary: Opponents’ argument that new homes are safer holds no weight

By Fred Durso, Jr. In my last post, I posed the question, “When do new homes become old homes?” In this post, I continue analyzing the sprinkler opponent’s argument that fire sprinklers need not be required in new homes because new homes are safer from fire than old homes. People who make this claim point to improved electrical wiring and circuits; updated furnaces and appliances; improved vertical and horizontal fire separations; larger windows, especially provided in basements with bedrooms; and the installation of smoke alarms. It is true that these improvements do help reduce some causes of home fires and some avenues of fire…

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

Smoking blamed for displacing dozens of residents in neighboring Massachusetts communities

By Lisa Braxton Fire officials are blaming the careless disposal of smoking materials for causing three fires recently in neighboring…

Your Data Toolbox in the Age of COVID-19: Feeding Your Community Risk Assessment

By nfpa@jiveon.com While we owe an immeasurable debt of gratitude to our healthcare workers, first responders, and grocery store employees…

NFPA receives grant from FM Global to support attendee participation at fall wildfire conference

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) announced it has received a $5,000 fire prevention grant from FM Global, one of…