Traduction

New York Times story shoots down popular myth that sprinkler requirements negatively impact housing development

By Fred Durso, Jr. If there’s one myth fire sprinkler advocates hear ad nauseum, it’s the one about fire sprinkler ordinances driving up housing costs and forcing homeowners to seek cheaper alternatives in neighboring communities or states. A recent article in The New York Times notes this notion couldn’t be further from the truth. California has been requiring sprinklers in new homes since 2011, and has not seen a negative impact on housing stock or affordability. In fact, as the story states, “there’s a robust demand for housing.Take into consideration these figures highlighted in the story: the Sacramento region has approved more than

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

NFPA announces 2016 Le feu et la vie Sécurité Educator du lauréat Année

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has selected Sherrie Leeka, public education officer for the Westminster Fire Department, Westminster, Colo.,

Opposition to proposed changes of fire sprinkler regulations in Wisconsin

By nfpa@jiveon.com Wisconsin officials have proposed changes in state regulations that would reduce requirements for fire sprinklers in new homes,…

Cooking is a hallmark of the holiday season, but so is increased risk of cooking fires

By nfpa@jiveon.com As the holiday season reaches its zenith with family gatherings, festive activities and elaborate meals, let’s not forget