Traduction

New York Times story shoots down popular myth that sprinkler requirements negatively impact housing development

By Fred Durso, Jr. If there’s one myth fire sprinkler advocates hear ad nauseum, it’s the one about fire sprinkler ordinances driving up housing costs and forcing homeowners to seek cheaper alternatives in neighboring communities or states. A recent article in The New York Times notes this notion couldn’t be further from the truth. California has been requiring sprinklers in new homes since 2011, and has not seen a negative impact on housing stock or affordability. In fact, as the story states, “there’s a robust demand for housing.Take into consideration these figures highlighted in the story: the Sacramento region has approved more than

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

House fire caused by frying oil on stove

By LisaMarie Sinatra A story out of Arizona this week can easily make you stop and think, “Wow, this could

Watch NFPA’s latest webinarFive Steps to Better Advocate for Home Fire Sprinklers

By nfpune@jiveon.com In case you missed it, we’re giving you the chance to view NFPA’s Fire Sprinkler Initiative’s latest webinar.

In part three of ourSmoke Alarm Smartsvideo series, Sparky asks people how often smoke alarms should be replaced

Par Susan McKelvey En prévision de la Semaine de la prévention des incendies, Octobre 4-10, Aujourd'hui, nous lançons la troisième vidéo dans notre "Smoke…