Traduction

New York Times story shoots down popular myth that sprinkler requirements negatively impact housing development

By Fred Durso, Jr. If there’s one myth fire sprinkler advocates hear ad nauseum, it’s the one about fire sprinkler ordinances driving up housing costs and forcing homeowners to seek cheaper alternatives in neighboring communities or states. A recent article in The New York Times notes this notion couldn’t be further from the truth. California has been requiring sprinklers in new homes since 2011, and has not seen a negative impact on housing stock or affordability. In fact, as the story states, “there’s a robust demand for housing.Take into consideration these figures highlighted in the story: the Sacramento region has approved more than

Source:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Related Articles

logo de la campagne vous aide à personnaliser votre campagne de la Semaine de prévention des incendies

By nfpa@jiveon.com Logos are defined as the “face” of an organization. They are graphical displays of a company’s unique identity

Se souvenir Lors de l'atelier Prochaines étapes se réunit au siège de la NFPA

By nfpune@jiveon.com The first Remembering When™ Next Steps workshop is underway at NFPA headquarters in Quincy, Massachusetts. Fourteen teams from

5 grilling tips to keep you fire safe this Labor Day weekend

By nfpa@jiveon.com Where did the summer go? For most of us, the month of August has just flown by! But