Traducción

New York Times story shoots down popular myth that sprinkler requirements negatively impact housing development

Por Fred Durso, Jr. If there’s one myth fire sprinkler advocates hear ad nauseum, it’s the one about fire sprinkler ordinances driving up housing costs and forcing homeowners to seek cheaper alternatives in neighboring communities or states. A recent article in The New York Times notes this notion couldn’t be further from the truth. California has been requiring sprinklers in new homes since 2011, and has not seen a negative impact on housing stock or affordability. In fact, as the story states, “there’s a robust demand for housing.Take into consideration these figures highlighted in the story: the Sacramento region has approved more than

Fuente:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Artículos relacionados

In a state prohibiting home fire sprinklers, another advocate pushes for sprinkler requirements

Por nfpa@jyovmionorte.doom Following pointed comments to the media about Pennsylvania’s lack of fire sprinkler laws, another safety advocate has come

Fire Prevention Week, Octubre 4-10, promotes smoke alarms in every bedroom and on every floor of the home

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the official sponsor of Fire Prevention Week for more than 90 año, is gearing

The latest in NFPA’s new video series underscores long-lasting, emotional torment following home fires

Por Fred Durso, Jr. “I didn’t realize [my burn injuries] would affect not just me, but my wife and kids.