Comentario: Opponentsargument that new homes are safer holds no weight

Por Fred Durso, Jr. In my last post, I posed the question, “When do new homes become old homes?” In this post, I continue analyzing the sprinkler opponent’s argument that fire sprinklers need not be required in new homes because new homes are safer from fire than old homes. People who make this claim point to improved electrical wiring and circuits; updated furnaces and appliances; improved vertical and horizontal fire separations; larger windows, especially provided in basements with bedrooms; and the installation of smoke alarms. It is true that these improvements do help reduce some causes of home fires and some avenues of fire

Fuente:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative

Artículos relacionados

Building officials, water purveyors, and politicians get schooled on home fire sprinklers and NFPA 13D during informative event

Por Fred Durso, Jr. In a span of only four hours, safety advocates in Connecticut debunked myths, highlighted the facts,…

Firewise and USAA team up on program to help protect New Mexico and Utah neighborhoods

USAA policyholders living in recognized Firewise Communities/USA® sites in New Mexico and Utah can now receive discounts on their homeowners

Sparky checks off bucket list item #53: Visits the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall

Por nFpun@jyovmionorte.clam Sparky took a trip to visit the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall that’s pays tribute to the brave people