Traducción

Comentario: Opponentsargument that new homes are safer holds no weight

Por Fred Durso, Jr. In my last post, I posed the question, “When do new homes become old homes?” In this post, I continue analyzing the sprinkler opponent’s argument that fire sprinklers need not be required in new homes because new homes are safer from fire than old homes. People who make this claim point to improved electrical wiring and circuits; updated furnaces and appliances; improved vertical and horizontal fire separations; larger windows, especially provided in basements with bedrooms; and the installation of smoke alarms. It is true that these improvements do help reduce some causes of home fires and some avenues of fire

Fuente:: NFPA – Fire Sprinkler Initiative


Artículos relacionados

NFPA announces home fire sprinkler grant awards

To further understanding and use of home fire sprinklers, the National Fire Protection Association’s (NFPA) Fire Sprinkler Initiative today announced

Ahora aceptando comentarios públicos para la próxima edición de la norma NFPA 13D, el estándar de rociadores residencial

por nfpa@jivelan.com NFPA’s Standards Council recently issued the 2016 edición de la norma NFPA 13D, Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- y…

NFPA and The Center for Campus Fire Safety announce winners of 2015 Campus Fire Safety for Students Contest

The two-tiered contest, que se desarrolló septiembre 1 - 25 en conjunto con Campus Mes de Seguridad contra Incendios, targeted students currently enrolled